Digital M&A Communication Strategies For Public Company IR Marketing Success

M&A communication strategies in the digital era have fundamentally transformed how public companies manage stakeholder relationships during merger and acquisition activities. Digital M&A communications encompass the strategic use of online platforms, social media, and digital tools to manage information flow, maintain transparency, and preserve shareholder confidence throughout the transaction lifecycle while adhering to regulatory requirements like SEC Regulation FD and NYSE communications standards.

Key Summary: Digital M&A communication strategies combine traditional investor relations practices with modern digital tools to manage complex stakeholder communications during transactions while maintaining regulatory compliance and preserving market confidence.

Key Takeaways:

• Digital M&A communications require coordinated messaging across multiple platforms while maintaining SEC Regulation FD compliance
• Real-time stakeholder engagement through digital channels can reduce market volatility and information asymmetries
• Social media monitoring and crisis management become critical during M&A announcements and due diligence periods
• Digital tools enable more precise targeting of institutional investors, retail shareholders, and media stakeholders
• Integration of traditional IR practices with digital platforms creates more comprehensive stakeholder engagement strategies
• Compliance oversight must extend to all digital touchpoints, including executive social media presence and company communications

This article explores M&A communication strategies digital within the broader context of comprehensive investor relations digital strategy, examining how public companies can leverage digital channels while maintaining regulatory compliance during complex corporate transactions.

What Are Digital M&A Communication Strategies?

Digital M&A communication strategies represent the systematic use of digital platforms, tools, and methodologies to manage information flow and stakeholder engagement during merger and acquisition activities. These strategies integrate traditional investor relations practices with modern digital capabilities to ensure transparent, compliant, and effective communication with all stakeholder groups throughout the transaction process.

M&A Digital Communications: The coordinated use of digital platforms, social media, and online tools to manage stakeholder communications during merger and acquisition transactions while maintaining regulatory compliance and market confidence. Learn more about Regulation FD

The digital transformation of M&A communications addresses several critical challenges that traditional communication methods often struggle to manage effectively. Information asymmetries between institutional and retail investors can create market volatility, while the speed of digital information flow requires real-time response capabilities that many traditional IR departments lack.

Modern M&A digital communication strategies typically encompass multiple interconnected components:

• Multi-channel messaging coordination: Ensuring consistent information across websites, social media, press releases, and investor communications
• Real-time monitoring and response: Tracking market reactions, media coverage, and social sentiment to enable rapid response to misinformation or concerns
• Stakeholder segmentation: Tailoring messages and delivery methods to specific audience groups including institutional investors, retail shareholders, employees, and regulatory bodies
• Compliance integration: Building regulatory review processes into digital workflows to ensure all communications meet SEC, FINRA, and exchange requirements
• Crisis management protocols: Establishing escalation procedures and response templates for managing negative reactions or information leaks

How Do Digital Channels Transform M&A Communications?

Digital channels fundamentally alter the dynamics of M&A communications by accelerating information flow, expanding reach, and creating new opportunities for stakeholder engagement. Unlike traditional methods that relied primarily on press releases, SEC filings, and analyst calls, digital channels enable continuous dialogue and real-time feedback loops with stakeholder communities.

The transformation occurs across multiple dimensions of the communication process. Speed becomes paramount as digital channels can disseminate information to global audiences within minutes of approval, compared to the hours or days required for traditional distribution methods. This acceleration requires companies to develop more agile approval processes while maintaining thorough compliance review.

Traditional vs. Digital M&A Communication Channels:

Traditional Channels:

• Reach: Limited to media outlets, institutional investors, and regulatory filings
• Timing: Scheduled releases with limited real-time interaction
• Feedback: Delayed through analyst calls and investor meetings
• Cost: High per-contact costs through intermediaries
• Best For: Formal announcements, regulatory compliance, institutional communications

Digital Channels:

• Reach: Direct access to retail investors, broader media ecosystem, and social networks
• Timing: Real-time distribution with immediate market impact
• Feedback: Instant market reaction data and sentiment analysis
• Cost: Lower marginal costs for broad distribution
• Best For: Stakeholder education, sentiment management, crisis response, market education

Digital channels also enable more sophisticated targeting and personalization of messages. Companies can segment communications based on investor type, geographic location, or investment preferences, delivering more relevant information to each stakeholder group while maintaining consistent core messaging.

Why Is Regulatory Compliance Critical in Digital M&A Communications?

Regulatory compliance in digital M&A communications is essential because securities laws apply equally to all forms of corporate communication, regardless of the platform or medium used. The SEC's Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) requires that material information be disclosed to all investors simultaneously, making the speed and broad reach of digital channels both an advantage and a compliance challenge.

Digital platforms create unique compliance risks that traditional communications methods do not present. Social media posts, website updates, and digital investor presentations can inadvertently create selective disclosure situations if not properly managed. The informal nature of some digital communications can lead to inconsistent messaging or the unintentional disclosure of material information outside of approved channels.

Regulation FD: SEC rule requiring public companies to disclose material information to all investors simultaneously, preventing selective disclosure to analysts or institutional investors before retail shareholders. View SEC Regulation FD

The compliance framework for digital M&A communications must address several specific requirements:

• Simultaneous disclosure: All material information must be released to the public at the same time across all channels
• Record retention: Digital communications must be archived and maintained according to SEC and exchange requirements
• Review and approval: All digital content requires the same level of legal and compliance review as traditional communications
• Attribution and authorization: Clear policies must govern who can speak on behalf of the company through digital channels
• Correction procedures: Processes must exist to quickly correct or clarify digital communications that contain errors or could be misleading

Agencies specializing in financial services marketing, such as WOLF Financial, build compliance review into every campaign to ensure adherence to FINRA Rule 2210 and SEC advertising requirements, recognizing that digital channels require the same regulatory rigor as traditional communications methods.

What Are the Key Components of a Digital M&A Communication Strategy?

A comprehensive digital M&A communication strategy integrates multiple components that work together to manage information flow, stakeholder engagement, and market sentiment throughout the transaction lifecycle. These components must be coordinated to ensure consistent messaging while leveraging the unique capabilities of each digital platform and tool.

The foundation of any digital M&A communication strategy rests on stakeholder mapping and message architecture. Companies must identify all relevant stakeholder groups, understand their information needs and preferred communication channels, then develop core messages that can be adapted for different audiences while maintaining consistency.

Core Strategic Components:

• Message Architecture and Narrative Development: Creating compelling, factual storylines that explain transaction rationale, expected benefits, and timeline milestones
• Multi-Platform Content Strategy: Developing content formats optimized for websites, social media, video platforms, and mobile applications
• Real-Time Monitoring and Analytics: Implementing tools to track market sentiment, media coverage, and stakeholder reactions across digital channels
• Crisis Communication Protocols: Establishing rapid response procedures for addressing misinformation, negative sentiment, or unexpected developments
• Stakeholder Engagement Planning: Designing interactive elements such as investor webinars, Q&A sessions, and feedback collection mechanisms
• Compliance and Approval Workflows: Creating streamlined processes for legal review and approval of digital content while maintaining speed-to-market requirements

The integration of these components requires careful coordination between investor relations, legal, marketing, and executive teams. Each component must align with overall transaction objectives while addressing the specific requirements and constraints of M&A communications.

How Should Companies Manage Social Media During M&A Activities?

Social media management during M&A activities requires heightened attention to compliance, message consistency, and stakeholder sentiment monitoring. Companies must balance the engagement opportunities that social platforms provide with the regulatory requirements and reputational risks inherent in M&A communications.

The approach to social media during M&A periods typically differs significantly from standard corporate social media strategies. The material nature of M&A information means that even seemingly routine social media activity can inadvertently create compliance issues or market confusion if not properly managed.

Social Media Management Framework for M&A:

• Content Approval Escalation: All social media content during M&A periods should receive additional legal and IR review before publication
• Executive Account Management: CEO and senior executive personal accounts should be monitored and potentially restricted during sensitive periods
• Stakeholder Engagement Guidelines: Clear protocols for responding to investor questions, media inquiries, and public comments on social platforms
• Sentiment Monitoring and Response: Real-time tracking of social media sentiment with predetermined response triggers for negative trends or misinformation
• Cross-Platform Consistency: Ensuring that messages and timing align across all social media platforms and with traditional communication channels

Companies should also consider the global nature of social media platforms when managing M&A communications. Content that complies with U.S. securities laws may still create issues in international markets where the company has operations or shareholders, requiring coordination with international legal and compliance teams.

What Role Does Crisis Management Play in Digital M&A Communications?

Crisis management becomes exponentially more important in digital M&A communications due to the speed at which information—and misinformation—can spread across digital networks. A single misleading social media post, leaked document, or negative analyst comment can reach thousands of stakeholders within minutes, potentially affecting stock prices and transaction outcomes before companies can respond.

Digital crisis management for M&A requires proactive planning rather than reactive responses. Companies must anticipate potential crisis scenarios and develop response protocols that can be activated quickly while maintaining compliance with securities regulations and transaction agreements.

Digital M&A Crisis Management: The systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and responding to reputation-threatening events during M&A transactions across digital platforms while maintaining regulatory compliance and stakeholder confidence.

Effective crisis management strategies address both internal and external factors that could derail transaction communications:

• Early Warning Systems: Automated monitoring tools that track mentions, sentiment changes, and unusual trading activity across digital platforms
• Response Team Structure: Pre-designated teams including IR, legal, executive, and external agency resources with clear decision-making authority
• Message Templates and Approval: Pre-approved response templates for common crisis scenarios that can be quickly customized and deployed
• Escalation Protocols: Clear criteria for determining when situations require CEO involvement, board notification, or regulatory disclosure
• Stakeholder Communication Sequences: Predetermined communication order ensuring that key stakeholders receive accurate information before broader public disclosure

Analysis of 400+ institutional finance campaigns reveals that companies with established digital crisis management protocols typically resolve negative sentiment events 60-80% faster than those relying solely on traditional crisis communication methods.

How Can Technology Enhance M&A Communication Effectiveness?

Technology enhancement in M&A communications extends far beyond basic social media management to encompass sophisticated analytics, automation, and stakeholder engagement platforms. Advanced technology solutions enable companies to process vast amounts of stakeholder data, personalize communications at scale, and respond to market developments in real-time while maintaining compliance oversight.

The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies allows companies to analyze stakeholder sentiment, predict market reactions, and optimize message timing and delivery methods. These capabilities become particularly valuable during complex M&A transactions where multiple stakeholder groups may have conflicting interests or concerns.

Technology Solutions for M&A Communications:

• Integrated Communication Platforms: Systems that coordinate message delivery across websites, email, social media, and mobile applications from a single interface
• Sentiment Analysis and Predictive Analytics: AI-powered tools that analyze stakeholder reactions and predict potential communication challenges before they escalate
• Automated Compliance Monitoring: Software that flags potential regulatory issues in real-time and maintains audit trails for all digital communications
• Personalization and Targeting Engines: Technologies that deliver customized content to different stakeholder segments while maintaining consistent core messaging
• Real-Time Collaboration Tools: Platforms that enable legal, IR, and executive teams to collaborate on communication approvals and responses regardless of location

When evaluating potential technology partners, financial institutions should prioritize vendors with demonstrated regulatory expertise, established integration capabilities, and transparent performance metrics that align with M&A communication objectives.

What Are Best Practices for Investor Relations During Digital M&A Communications?

Investor relations during digital M&A communications requires a more nuanced approach than standard IR activities, as the stakes are higher and the audience more diverse. Best practices focus on maintaining transparency while managing the complex information flow requirements inherent in M&A transactions.

The most effective digital IR strategies during M&A activities center on proactive communication rather than reactive responses. Companies that establish clear communication schedules, provide regular updates, and address investor concerns promptly typically experience less volatility and more positive stakeholder sentiment throughout the transaction process.

Digital IR Best Practices for M&A:

• Proactive Timeline Communication: Establishing clear milestones and communication schedules that investors can rely on for transaction updates
• Multi-Format Content Strategy: Providing information through video presentations, interactive infographics, and downloadable resources to accommodate different investor preferences
• Segmented Stakeholder Approach: Tailoring communication depth and technical detail to different investor categories while maintaining consistent core messages
• Real-Time FAQ Management: Maintaining updated FAQ sections on company websites and investor portals that address emerging questions and concerns
• Integration with Traditional IR Activities: Ensuring that digital communications complement rather than replace essential IR activities like analyst calls and investor meetings
• Post-Transaction Integration Planning: Communicating integration progress and synergy realization through digital channels to maintain investor confidence beyond closing

According to agencies managing 10+ billion monthly impressions across financial creator networks, the most effective M&A IR campaigns prioritize education about transaction benefits and integration planning over promotional messaging, resulting in more sustained investor support throughout the transaction timeline.

How Do Companies Measure Success in Digital M&A Communications?

Measuring success in digital M&A communications requires a comprehensive framework that extends beyond traditional metrics like reach and engagement to include transaction-specific indicators such as stakeholder sentiment, information accuracy, and market stability. Companies must establish baseline measurements before transaction announcements and track progress throughout the entire M&A lifecycle.

Success measurement frameworks typically incorporate both quantitative and qualitative metrics that align with overall transaction objectives. The most meaningful metrics often relate to stakeholder behavior changes rather than simple communication reach statistics.

Key Performance Indicators for Digital M&A Communications:

• Stakeholder Sentiment Metrics: Tracking sentiment scores across digital platforms, investor survey responses, and analyst commentary
• Information Accuracy and Consistency: Measuring the prevalence of accurate vs. inaccurate information in digital media coverage and social discussions
• Market Stability Indicators: Analyzing trading volume volatility, price movements, and correlation with communication events
• Engagement Quality Metrics: Assessing depth of stakeholder engagement rather than simple view counts or clicks
• Compliance and Risk Metrics: Tracking compliance incidents, correction requirements, and regulatory feedback
• Transaction Timeline Impact: Measuring how communication effectiveness affects regulatory approval timing and closing conditions

The most successful companies establish measurement frameworks before beginning M&A communications and adjust strategies based on real-time performance data rather than waiting for post-transaction analysis.

What Challenges Do Companies Face in Digital M&A Communications?

Companies face numerous interconnected challenges when implementing digital M&A communication strategies, ranging from regulatory compliance complexity to stakeholder management across multiple platforms. These challenges are often amplified by the high-stakes nature of M&A transactions and the compressed timelines that many deals require.

The primary challenge stems from balancing transparency requirements with competitive sensitivity and regulatory restrictions. M&A transactions involve material information that must be disclosed appropriately while protecting commercially sensitive details that could affect transaction outcomes or competitive positioning.

Common Digital M&A Communication Challenges:

• Regulatory Complexity: Managing compliance across multiple jurisdictions, securities laws, and exchange requirements simultaneously
• Information Timing and Coordination: Ensuring that all stakeholders receive material information simultaneously across different time zones and platforms
• Resource Allocation and Expertise: Balancing internal team capabilities with external agency support while maintaining control over sensitive information
• Technology Integration: Coordinating multiple communication platforms and ensuring consistent messaging across different systems
• Stakeholder Expectation Management: Addressing diverse stakeholder information needs while maintaining transaction confidentiality requirements
• Crisis Response Preparedness: Developing response capabilities for multiple scenario types without creating unnecessary alarm or speculation

Companies that successfully navigate these challenges typically invest in comprehensive planning and cross-functional team coordination well before transaction announcements, recognizing that effective digital M&A communications require more preparation than traditional approaches.

Frequently Asked Questions

Basics

1. What makes M&A communications different from regular corporate communications?

M&A communications involve material information that can significantly impact stock prices and investor decisions, requiring stricter regulatory compliance, coordinated timing across multiple parties, and management of commercially sensitive information that standard corporate communications do not typically handle.

2. Do digital M&A communications require SEC approval?

Digital M&A communications do not require pre-approval from the SEC, but they must comply with all securities laws including Regulation FD, antifraud provisions, and disclosure requirements. Companies typically require internal legal review and approval before publishing any M&A-related digital content.

3. What is the difference between digital and traditional M&A communications?

Digital M&A communications offer broader reach, faster distribution, and real-time stakeholder feedback compared to traditional methods, but require more sophisticated compliance oversight and crisis management capabilities due to the speed and scope of information distribution.

4. Who should manage digital M&A communications within a company?

Digital M&A communications require coordination between investor relations, legal, executive teams, and often external agencies with specialized expertise. No single department typically has all the necessary skills, making cross-functional collaboration essential.

5. How long before an M&A announcement should digital communication planning begin?

Digital communication planning should begin as soon as M&A discussions become serious, typically 3-6 months before anticipated announcements, to allow time for strategy development, compliance review, and crisis management preparation.

How-To

6. How do companies ensure Regulation FD compliance in digital M&A communications?

Companies ensure Regulation FD compliance by releasing all material information simultaneously across multiple public channels, avoiding selective disclosure through social media or other digital platforms, and maintaining careful documentation of all communication timing and content.

7. How should companies handle social media during M&A quiet periods?

During quiet periods, companies should limit social media activity to routine, non-material content, increase approval requirements for all posts, monitor executive personal accounts, and avoid engaging with speculation or transaction-related discussions on social platforms.

8. How can companies measure stakeholder sentiment during M&A communications?

Companies can measure stakeholder sentiment through social media monitoring tools, investor survey feedback, analyst commentary analysis, trading volume patterns, and direct stakeholder engagement metrics across digital platforms.

9. How do companies coordinate digital communications across multiple time zones during global M&A transactions?

Global M&A digital communications require centralized command centers, pre-scheduled content releases, real-time collaboration platforms, and coordination with international legal and regulatory requirements to ensure simultaneous disclosure across all relevant markets.

10. How should companies prepare for digital crisis management during M&A transactions?

Digital crisis preparation involves developing response team structures, creating pre-approved message templates, establishing monitoring and escalation protocols, and conducting scenario planning exercises to test response capabilities before transactions are announced.

Comparison

11. Should companies use internal teams or external agencies for digital M&A communications?

Most companies benefit from hybrid approaches combining internal control and strategic oversight with external agency expertise in digital platforms, compliance, and specialized M&A communication experience, as few companies have all necessary capabilities in-house.

12. Which digital platforms are most effective for M&A communications?

Effectiveness depends on stakeholder composition, but typically includes company websites for comprehensive information, LinkedIn for professional audiences, Twitter for real-time updates, and email for direct investor communications, with platform selection based on where target stakeholders consume financial information.

13. What are the advantages and disadvantages of real-time M&A communications?

Real-time communications enable immediate stakeholder engagement and rapid response to market developments, but increase compliance risks, require more sophisticated approval processes, and can amplify negative reactions if not managed carefully.

14. How do digital M&A communications compare in cost to traditional methods?

Digital M&A communications typically have lower marginal distribution costs but require higher upfront investment in technology, monitoring, and specialized expertise. Total costs depend on transaction complexity and stakeholder management requirements.

Troubleshooting

15. What should companies do if incorrect information spreads on digital platforms during M&A transactions?

Companies should immediately assess whether correction requires formal disclosure, issue clarifying statements through appropriate channels, engage with the source of misinformation if possible, and monitor for further spread while documenting all corrective actions taken.

16. How can companies handle negative stakeholder reactions on social media during M&A announcements?

Companies should acknowledge stakeholder concerns professionally, provide factual information to address specific issues, avoid defensive responses, redirect detailed discussions to appropriate channels like investor relations contacts, and monitor sentiment trends for escalation needs.

17. What happens if digital M&A communications accidentally violate securities regulations?

Accidental violations should be immediately assessed with legal counsel, corrected through appropriate disclosure channels if necessary, documented for regulatory inquiries, and used to improve future communication protocols and approval processes.

18. How should companies respond to leaks or premature disclosure of M&A information on digital platforms?

Companies must quickly assess whether the leak requires immediate formal disclosure under Regulation FD, coordinate with transaction partners and legal counsel, issue appropriate public statements if necessary, and investigate the source to prevent future breaches.

Advanced

19. How do international regulations affect digital M&A communications for cross-border transactions?

Cross-border transactions must comply with securities regulations in all relevant jurisdictions, consider different disclosure timing requirements, address language and cultural communication differences, and coordinate with international regulatory bodies that may have conflicting requirements.

20. What role does artificial intelligence play in digital M&A communications?

AI enhances M&A communications through sentiment analysis, predictive analytics for stakeholder reactions, automated content personalization, real-time monitoring at scale, and pattern recognition for potential communication risks, but requires human oversight for regulatory compliance.

21. How do companies manage digital communications during hostile takeover situations?

Hostile takeover digital communications require heightened security measures, rapid response capabilities, aggressive monitoring of opponent communications, coordinated defense messaging across platforms, and careful management of stakeholder sentiment to maintain support.

Compliance/Risk

22. What are the biggest compliance risks in digital M&A communications?

Major compliance risks include inadvertent selective disclosure through social media, inconsistent messaging across platforms, unauthorized spokesperson communications, inadequate record retention, and failure to coordinate timing across jurisdictions and stakeholder groups.

23. How long must companies retain digital M&A communication records?

Digital M&A communication records must be retained according to SEC and exchange requirements, typically 3-6 years for most communications, with longer retention periods for material transaction documents and any communications subject to litigation or regulatory inquiry.

24. What insurance considerations apply to digital M&A communications?

Digital M&A communications may be covered under directors and officers insurance policies, but companies should verify coverage for digital communication errors, cyber liability for data breaches, and professional liability for agency relationships involved in communication strategy.

25. How do fiduciary duties affect digital M&A communication decisions?

Board and executive fiduciary duties require that digital M&A communications serve shareholder interests, provide accurate and complete material information, consider all stakeholder groups appropriately, and maintain appropriate oversight of communication strategies and outcomes.

Conclusion

Digital M&A communication strategies represent a fundamental evolution in how public companies manage stakeholder relationships during complex corporate transactions. The integration of digital platforms with traditional investor relations practices creates unprecedented opportunities for transparency, stakeholder engagement, and market education, while simultaneously introducing new compliance challenges and requiring more sophisticated crisis management capabilities.

When evaluating digital M&A communication approaches, companies should consider their stakeholder composition, regulatory requirements, internal capabilities, and transaction complexity. Success depends on early planning, cross-functional collaboration, technology integration, and maintaining rigorous compliance oversight throughout the communication process. The most effective strategies balance transparency with commercial sensitivity while leveraging digital tools to enhance rather than replace fundamental investor relations principles.

For public companies and financial institutions seeking to develop comprehensive digital communication strategies that support M&A activities while maintaining regulatory compliance, explore how WOLF Financial combines creator network expertise with deep regulatory knowledge to help institutional clients navigate complex transaction communications.

References

1. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading - Final Rule." SEC.gov. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7881.htm
2. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. "Communications with the Public - Rule 2210." FINRA.org. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/2210
3. New York Stock Exchange. "Listed Company Manual - Section 2." NYSE.com. https://nyseguide.srorules.com/listed-company-manual
4. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Guidance on Social Media and Investment Adviser Marketing." SEC.gov. https://www.sec.gov/investment/guidance-social-media-investment-adviser-marketing
5. NASDAQ. "Corporate Governance Rules and Interpretations." NASDAQ.com. https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules
6. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Division of Corporation Finance: CF Disclosure Guidance." SEC.gov. https://www.sec.gov/corpfin/cf-manual
7. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. "Social Media Guidelines for Broker-Dealers." FINRA.org. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/guidance/reports/social-media-guidelines
8. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Modernization of Regulation S-K Items 101, 103, and 105." SEC.gov. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2020/33-10825.pdf
9. International Organization of Securities Commissions. "Social Media and Automation in Retail Investment Services." IOSCO.org. https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD682.pdf
10. CFA Institute. "Social Media Guidelines for Investment Professionals." CFAInstitute.org. https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/ethics-standards/codes/social-media-guidelines
11. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. "Digital Communications Best Practices." SIFMA.org. https://www.sifma.org/resources/general/digital-communications/
12. North American Securities Administrators Association. "Model Rule on Social Media." NASAA.org. https://www.nasaa.org/industry-resources/investment-advisers/social-media/

Important Disclaimers

Disclaimer: Educational information only. Not financial, legal, medical, or tax advice.

Risk Warnings: All investments carry risk, including loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Conflicts of Interest: This article may contain affiliate links; see our disclosures.

Publication Information: Published: AUTO_NOW · Last updated: AUTO_NOW

About the Author

Author: Gav Blaxberg, Founder, WOLF Financial
LinkedIn Profile