SEC Regulation FD Social Media Compliance Guide For Public Companies

SEC Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) social media compliance requires public companies to treat social media communications as potential material disclosures, ensuring simultaneous and equal access to information for all investors. When applied to investor relations and corporate communications, this regulation fundamentally transforms how public companies can engage on social platforms.

Key Summary: SEC Regulation FD mandates that public companies avoid selective disclosure of material information through social media, requiring comprehensive policies, pre-approval processes, and equal access protocols for all investor communications.

Key Takeaways:

• Regulation FD applies to all corporate social media activity that could contain material information
• Public companies must establish pre-approval workflows for social media posts by officers and investor relations teams
• Simultaneous disclosure requirements mean material information must be released via Regulation FD-compliant channels first
• Employee training and monitoring systems are essential for maintaining compliance across all social platforms
• Violations can result in SEC enforcement actions, civil penalties, and significant legal exposure
• Proper documentation and audit trails are required for all corporate social media activities
• Crisis communication protocols must account for Regulation FD requirements during market-sensitive events

This article explores SEC Regulation FD social media compliance within the broader context of comprehensive investor relations digital strategy, providing detailed guidance for public companies navigating the intersection of regulatory requirements and modern corporate communications.

What Is SEC Regulation FD and Why Does It Matter for Social Media?

SEC Regulation FD, formally known as Regulation Fair Disclosure, prohibits public companies from selectively disclosing material nonpublic information to certain individuals or entities before making that information available to the general public. The regulation fundamentally reshapes how public companies must approach social media communications in their investor relations and corporate communications strategies.

Regulation FD: A Securities and Exchange Commission rule requiring public companies to disclose material information to all investors simultaneously, preventing selective disclosure to analysts, institutional investors, or other market participants. Learn more from the SEC

The regulation's application to social media creates unique compliance challenges because platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook can instantly disseminate information to millions of users. When executives, investor relations officers, or other company representatives post content that could be considered material information, they risk violating Regulation FD if that information hasn't been properly disclosed through official channels first.

Material Information Defined:

• Financial performance data or guidance updates
• Significant business developments, partnerships, or acquisitions
• Regulatory approvals or legal developments
• Management changes or strategic initiatives
• Product launches or major customer wins
• Any information that could reasonably influence investment decisions

The stakes for non-compliance remain substantial. SEC enforcement actions for Regulation FD violations can result in cease-and-desist orders, civil monetary penalties, and significant reputational damage. For public companies operating in today's digital landscape, understanding these requirements becomes essential for effective investor relations and corporate communications.

How Does Regulation FD Apply to Different Social Media Platforms?

Regulation FD requirements vary based on how public companies use different social media platforms, with each platform presenting distinct compliance considerations for investor relations teams. The key factor determining compliance requirements is whether the communication could contain material information and who has access to that information.

Twitter/X Compliance Considerations:

• Public tweets are generally permissible for non-material information and pre-disclosed content
• Reply threads and comment engagement require careful monitoring for inadvertent disclosures
• Twitter Spaces and live audio events present heightened risks due to real-time communication
• Retweeting third-party content could imply endorsement of potentially material information

LinkedIn Professional Network Requirements:

• Executive posts and company page updates must follow standard pre-approval processes
• Industry discussion participation requires training on avoiding selective disclosure
• Direct messaging with analysts or institutional investors creates potential Regulation FD violations
• Professional network connections don't exempt companies from fair disclosure requirements

Facebook and Instagram Corporate Presence:

• Business page posts generally treated similarly to other public communications
• Private group discussions or direct communications may trigger Regulation FD concerns
• Live video content requires real-time compliance monitoring
• Story content and temporary posts still subject to disclosure requirements

Financial institutions specializing in public company communications, such as agencies that manage social media strategies for hundreds of institutional clients, emphasize the importance of platform-specific policies that address each channel's unique characteristics while maintaining consistent compliance standards.

What Are the Essential Components of a Regulation FD Social Media Policy?

A comprehensive Regulation FD social media policy must establish clear guidelines for all corporate social media activity while creating practical workflows that enable effective investor relations and corporate communications. The policy serves as the foundation for training, monitoring, and enforcement across the organization.

Core Policy Elements:

• Authorized Personnel: Designation of specific individuals authorized to post on behalf of the company
• Pre-Approval Workflows: Required review processes for all posts that could contain material information
• Prohibited Content: Clear definitions of information that cannot be disclosed via social media
• Emergency Procedures: Protocols for addressing accidental disclosures or crisis communications
• Documentation Requirements: Record-keeping standards for all social media activities
• Third-Party Management: Guidelines for working with external agencies or consultants

Material Information: Information that a reasonable investor would consider important in making an investment decision, including financial data, business developments, and strategic initiatives that could affect stock price. SEC guidance on materiality

Pre-Approval Workflow Structure:

1. Content Creation: Draft posts reviewed against materiality guidelines
2. Legal Review: Assessment of potential Regulation FD implications
3. IR Team Approval: Confirmation that content aligns with disclosure schedule
4. Final Authorization: Executive sign-off for sensitive communications
5. Publication and Monitoring: Tracking of post performance and engagement

The policy must also address employee personal social media use when employees are identifiable as company representatives. This includes executives whose personal accounts may be followed by analysts, investors, or financial media, creating potential Regulation FD implications even for unofficial communications.

How Should Public Companies Handle Material Information on Social Media?

Public companies must establish clear protocols for handling material information in social media contexts, ensuring compliance with Regulation FD while maintaining effective investor relations and corporate communications strategies. The fundamental principle requires simultaneous disclosure to all investors rather than selective sharing through social channels.

Simultaneous Disclosure Requirements:

• Material information must first be disclosed through Regulation FD-compliant methods (8-K filings, press releases, public conference calls)
• Social media can be used to amplify or discuss information only after official disclosure
• Time delays between official disclosure and social media discussion should be minimized to maintain relevance
• Cross-platform coordination ensures consistent messaging across all corporate channels

When material information is inadvertently disclosed through social media, companies must take immediate corrective action. This includes promptly filing required SEC disclosures, issuing clarifying statements, and potentially halting trading if necessary to prevent unfair advantage to those who saw the social media communication first.

Inadvertent Disclosure: Unintentional release of material nonpublic information that requires immediate remediation through proper disclosure channels to maintain Regulation FD compliance. SEC staff guidance

Safe Harbor Practices:

• Information Calendars: Coordination between IR teams and social media managers on upcoming disclosures
• Template Approaches: Pre-approved language for common types of announcements
• Timing Protocols: Specific waiting periods between official disclosure and social media engagement
• Monitoring Systems: Real-time tracking of social media activity for potential compliance issues

Specialized B2B agencies managing social media strategies for institutional finance clients typically implement systematic approaches that include automated monitoring, compliance checkpoints, and rapid response protocols to address potential Regulation FD violations before they become enforcement issues.

What Training and Monitoring Systems Are Required?

Effective Regulation FD compliance requires comprehensive training programs and ongoing monitoring systems that ensure all personnel understand their responsibilities and potential risks. Training must address both technical compliance requirements and practical implementation across different social media scenarios.

Essential Training Components:

• Regulation FD Fundamentals: Basic understanding of fair disclosure requirements and their application to social media
• Materiality Assessment: Skills for evaluating whether information could be considered material to investors
• Platform-Specific Guidelines: Different compliance considerations for various social media channels
• Crisis Response: Procedures for addressing accidental disclosures or compliance violations
• Documentation Standards: Required record-keeping for compliance audits and SEC examinations

Training programs must be tailored to different roles within the organization. Executives require different guidance than social media managers, investor relations professionals, or general employees who may occasionally represent the company on social platforms.

Monitoring System Requirements:

• Real-Time Alerts: Automated systems to flag potentially problematic content before publication
• Keyword Tracking: Monitoring for financial terms, performance indicators, and business developments
• Engagement Analysis: Review of comments, replies, and interactions for selective disclosure risks
• Third-Party Monitoring: Tracking mentions and discussions by external parties that could create response obligations
• Audit Trail Maintenance: Complete documentation of all social media activities and approval processes

Selective Disclosure: The practice of revealing material information to specific individuals or groups before making it available to the general public, which is prohibited under Regulation FD. Legal definition

Agencies specializing in financial services social media management often provide monitoring services that combine automated technology with human oversight, offering real-time compliance review and immediate escalation protocols when potential violations are detected.

How Do Crisis Communications Intersect with Regulation FD Requirements?

Crisis communications for public companies must balance the need for rapid response with strict Regulation FD compliance requirements, creating unique challenges when material events occur during market hours or when social media becomes the primary communication channel. Effective crisis management requires pre-established protocols that maintain regulatory compliance while enabling timely stakeholder communication.

Crisis Communication Compliance Framework:

• Immediate Assessment: Rapid evaluation of whether crisis information constitutes material disclosure
• Disclosure Sequencing: Ensuring official SEC filings precede any social media communications
• Trading Considerations: Coordination with legal counsel on potential trading halts or market notifications
• Stakeholder Prioritization: Simultaneous communication to all investor groups without selective disclosure
• Documentation Requirements: Enhanced record-keeping during crisis periods for regulatory review

Common crisis scenarios that trigger Regulation FD considerations include cybersecurity incidents, executive departures, regulatory investigations, significant customer losses, or operational disruptions. Each scenario requires careful analysis of materiality and appropriate disclosure sequencing.

Social Media Crisis Response Protocols:

1. Immediate Containment: Halting scheduled social media posts and activating crisis team
2. Materiality Assessment: Legal and IR team evaluation of disclosure requirements
3. Official Disclosure: Filing required SEC documents before any public communication
4. Coordinated Response: Simultaneous release across all communication channels
5. Ongoing Monitoring: Enhanced surveillance of social media engagement and market reaction

Material Adverse Change: A significant negative development that could reasonably be expected to influence investment decisions, requiring prompt disclosure under Regulation FD and other SEC requirements. SEC disclosure guidance

The timing of crisis communications becomes particularly complex when events occur outside normal business hours or when social media discussions begin before official markets open. Companies must maintain 24/7 monitoring capabilities and pre-authorized response teams to address these scenarios while maintaining compliance.

What Are the Consequences of Regulation FD Violations?

Violations of Regulation FD through social media communications can result in significant SEC enforcement actions, civil penalties, and long-term reputational damage that affects investor relations and corporate credibility. Understanding potential consequences helps public companies prioritize compliance investments and risk management strategies.

SEC Enforcement Actions:

• Cease-and-Desist Orders: Formal orders requiring companies to stop violating behavior and implement compliance improvements
• Civil Monetary Penalties: Financial penalties that can reach hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars depending on violation severity
• Officer and Director Sanctions: Individual penalties against executives responsible for violations
• Enhanced Compliance Requirements: Mandatory implementation of additional oversight and monitoring systems
• Public Disclosure: SEC announcements of enforcement actions that create negative publicity

Beyond direct SEC penalties, Regulation FD violations can trigger secondary consequences including shareholder litigation, increased regulatory scrutiny, and challenges in future capital raising activities. The reputational impact on investor relations teams and executive credibility can persist long after financial penalties are resolved.

Recent Enforcement Examples:

• Companies penalized for executives making material disclosures during conference calls with selected analysts
• Enforcement actions related to earnings guidance shared through private social media communications
• Violations involving business development updates disclosed selectively to institutional investors
• Cases involving inadvertent material disclosures through executive personal social media accounts

Cease-and-Desist Order: An SEC enforcement action requiring a party to immediately stop engaging in specific conduct and often including requirements for future compliance measures and monitoring. SEC enforcement explanation

The indirect costs of violations often exceed direct penalties. These include increased legal fees, consultant costs for compliance system implementation, management time diverted from business operations, and potential impact on stock price and investor confidence.

Prevention remains significantly more cost-effective than remediation. Agencies that specialize in regulatory compliance for institutional finance clients report that comprehensive compliance programs typically cost a fraction of potential enforcement penalties while providing ongoing operational benefits.

How Should Public Companies Implement Regulation FD Social Media Compliance?

Implementing effective Regulation FD social media compliance requires a systematic approach that integrates legal requirements with practical business operations, ensuring investor relations teams can leverage social media effectively while maintaining regulatory compliance. The implementation process should address technology, personnel, and procedural elements simultaneously.

Implementation Roadmap:

1. Compliance Assessment: Evaluation of current social media practices against Regulation FD requirements
2. Policy Development: Creation of comprehensive written policies addressing all social media activities
3. Technology Integration: Implementation of monitoring and approval systems
4. Personnel Training: Comprehensive education programs for all relevant employees
5. Testing and Refinement: Pilot programs to validate procedures before full implementation
6. Ongoing Monitoring: Continuous surveillance and compliance assessment

The technology infrastructure supporting Regulation FD compliance must integrate with existing investor relations systems and corporate communication workflows. This includes content management systems, approval workflows, monitoring tools, and documentation platforms that create comprehensive audit trails.

Technology Stack Components:

• Content Management: Systems for creating, reviewing, and approving social media content
• Workflow Automation: Automated routing of content through compliance review processes
• Monitoring and Alerts: Real-time surveillance of social media activity for potential compliance issues
• Documentation Systems: Comprehensive record-keeping for regulatory examinations
• Integration Capabilities: Connectivity with existing IR and legal systems

Personnel assignments must clearly define roles and responsibilities while ensuring appropriate backup coverage for key compliance functions. This includes designating compliance officers, establishing escalation procedures, and maintaining 24/7 monitoring capabilities for crisis situations.

Specialized agencies managing social media compliance for multiple public companies often provide implementation consulting that combines regulatory expertise with practical operational experience, helping companies avoid common implementation challenges and accelerate time-to-compliance.

What Role Does Technology Play in Regulation FD Compliance?

Technology solutions play a critical role in maintaining Regulation FD compliance by providing automated monitoring, workflow management, and documentation capabilities that would be impractical to manage manually. Modern compliance technology must integrate seamlessly with existing investor relations systems while providing real-time oversight of social media activities.

Automated Monitoring Capabilities:

• Content Analysis: AI-powered systems that scan posts for potentially material information
• Keyword Detection: Automated flagging of financial terms, performance metrics, and business developments
• Sentiment Analysis: Monitoring for content that could influence investor perceptions
• Engagement Tracking: Surveillance of comments, replies, and interactions for compliance risks
• Cross-Platform Integration: Unified monitoring across multiple social media channels

Workflow management systems enable efficient pre-approval processes while maintaining necessary documentation for regulatory examinations. These systems must balance compliance requirements with the speed needed for effective social media engagement.

Automated Compliance Monitoring: Technology systems that continuously surveil communications and activities to identify potential regulatory violations in real-time, enabling immediate corrective action. FINRA technology guidance

Integration Requirements:

• CRM Systems: Connection with customer relationship management platforms
• Document Management: Integration with existing corporate document systems
• Calendar Systems: Coordination with earnings calendars and disclosure schedules
• Communication Platforms: Unified management of email, social media, and other channels
• Reporting Tools: Analytics and compliance reporting for management and regulators

The technology must also provide comprehensive audit trails that document all compliance activities, decisions, and approvals. This documentation becomes essential during SEC examinations and helps demonstrate good faith efforts to maintain compliance.

Technology providers specializing in financial services compliance typically offer solutions that combine automated monitoring with human oversight, recognizing that technology alone cannot address all compliance scenarios and that human judgment remains essential for materiality assessments and crisis response.

Frequently Asked Questions

Basics

1. What is SEC Regulation FD and when does it apply to social media?

SEC Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure) prohibits public companies from selectively disclosing material information to certain people before making it available to all investors. It applies to social media when corporate representatives post content that could contain material information that hasn't been properly disclosed to all investors simultaneously through official channels like SEC filings or press releases.

2. Who at a public company is subject to Regulation FD requirements on social media?

All corporate officers, investor relations personnel, and other employees who regularly communicate with analysts or investors are subject to Regulation FD. This includes CEOs, CFOs, IR directors, and any employees whose social media activity could be attributed to the company, even on personal accounts if they're identifiable as company representatives.

3. What constitutes "material information" in social media posts?

Material information includes any data that a reasonable investor would consider important in making investment decisions. This encompasses financial performance updates, business developments, strategic initiatives, regulatory approvals, significant partnerships, management changes, or guidance updates that could affect stock price.

4. Do personal social media accounts count under Regulation FD?

Yes, personal accounts can trigger Regulation FD requirements if the individual is identifiable as a company representative and posts information that could be considered material. Executive personal accounts are particularly scrutinized, especially if they're followed by analysts, investors, or financial media.

5. How does Regulation FD differ from other SEC social media requirements?

While general SEC guidance focuses on accuracy and compliance with securities laws, Regulation FD specifically addresses the timing and simultaneity of information disclosure. It's not about what you can say, but when and to whom you can say it, ensuring all investors receive material information at the same time.

How-To

6. How should companies establish pre-approval processes for social media posts?

Companies should implement multi-step workflows that include content review for materiality, legal assessment of Regulation FD implications, IR team approval to ensure alignment with disclosure schedules, and final executive authorization for sensitive communications. All steps should be documented with timestamps and approval records.

7. What steps should be taken if material information is accidentally disclosed on social media?

Immediately assess the materiality of the disclosure, file required SEC documents (typically Form 8-K) to provide broad public disclosure, issue clarifying statements if necessary, consider requesting trading halts to prevent unfair advantage, and document all remedial actions taken for regulatory review.

8. How can companies monitor social media activity for Regulation FD compliance?

Implement automated monitoring systems that scan for financial keywords and material information, establish real-time alerts for potentially problematic content, maintain comprehensive documentation of all social media activities, and provide regular training to ensure personnel understand compliance requirements.

9. How should crisis communications be handled under Regulation FD?

Develop pre-established protocols that prioritize official SEC disclosures before any social media communication, ensure simultaneous release across all channels, maintain enhanced monitoring during crisis periods, and coordinate with legal counsel on materiality assessments and potential trading implications.

10. What documentation is required for Regulation FD compliance?

Maintain records of all social media posts and approvals, document training provided to employees, keep audit trails of monitoring activities, preserve communications related to materiality assessments, and retain evidence of remedial actions taken for any compliance issues.

Comparison

11. How do Regulation FD requirements differ across social media platforms?

While the underlying requirements remain consistent, implementation varies by platform. Twitter's public nature makes most posts permissible for non-material content, LinkedIn's professional networking features require careful monitoring of direct communications, and Facebook's group discussions may create selective disclosure risks that public posts avoid.

12. What's the difference between material and non-material information for social media purposes?

Material information could reasonably influence investment decisions and includes financial data, business developments, or strategic changes. Non-material information includes general industry commentary, historical information already disclosed, company culture content, and routine operational updates that wouldn't affect investor decisions.

13. How do public company requirements differ from private company social media compliance?

Public companies face Regulation FD requirements that don't apply to private companies, must consider impact on stock price and trading, face SEC enforcement for violations, and require more comprehensive monitoring systems. Private companies primarily focus on general securities law compliance and industry-specific regulations.

14. What's the difference between intentional and inadvertent disclosure under Regulation FD?

Intentional disclosures require immediate broad public disclosure through proper channels before the selective disclosure occurs. Inadvertent disclosures must be corrected "promptly," typically within 24 hours, through official SEC filings and public statements to ensure all investors have access to the information.

Troubleshooting

15. What happens if employees post company information without authorization?

Companies remain liable for unauthorized posts by employees if the information is material and the employee is identifiable as a company representative. Immediate remediation through proper disclosure channels is required, along with internal disciplinary action and enhanced training to prevent future violations.

16. How should companies handle third-party mentions or tags that could create disclosure obligations?

Monitor all mentions and tags for material information, avoid responding to or amplifying content that contains undisclosed material information, maintain policies for engaging with third-party content, and ensure all responses comply with existing disclosure schedules and Regulation FD requirements.

17. What if material information is disclosed during live social media events like Twitter Spaces?

Live events present heightened risks requiring real-time compliance monitoring, pre-event briefings on prohibited topics, immediate intervention capabilities if material information is disclosed, and post-event review to identify any disclosure issues that require remediation through proper channels.

18. How should companies address social media activity by former employees who may have material information?

While companies cannot control former employees' communications, they should maintain comprehensive exit procedures that remind departing employees of ongoing confidentiality obligations, monitor for potential disclosure issues, and be prepared to issue clarifying statements if former employees make claims that require corporate response.

Advanced

19. How do international social media communications affect Regulation FD compliance?

U.S. public companies remain subject to Regulation FD regardless of where communications originate, requiring global coordination of social media policies. International subsidiaries and employees must understand U.S. requirements, and time zone differences complicate real-time monitoring and approval processes.

20. What role do social media algorithms play in Regulation FD compliance?

While companies cannot control algorithmic distribution, they remain responsible for ensuring material information is disclosed properly before any social media posting. Algorithm-driven amplification doesn't create Regulation FD violations, but selective sharing with specific audiences before broad disclosure does.

21. How should companies handle social media communications during quiet periods?

Quiet periods require enhanced scrutiny of all communications, with many companies implementing complete social media blackouts for material information during periods before earnings releases. Non-material communications may continue with appropriate pre-approval processes and enhanced monitoring.

22. What compliance considerations apply to social media advertising and paid promotion?

Paid social media content faces additional SEC advertising regulations beyond Regulation FD, requiring compliance with both fair disclosure requirements and general securities advertising rules. Targeting specific investor audiences with material information could create selective disclosure issues requiring careful legal review.

Compliance/Risk

23. What are the potential penalties for Regulation FD violations through social media?

Violations can result in SEC cease-and-desist orders, civil monetary penalties ranging from thousands to millions of dollars, individual sanctions against responsible officers, mandatory compliance program enhancements, and reputational damage that affects investor relations and stock performance.

24. How often should companies review and update their Regulation FD social media policies?

Policies should be reviewed annually at minimum, with updates triggered by regulatory changes, enforcement actions, new social media platforms, significant business changes, or compliance issues. Regular policy updates ensure continued effectiveness as technology and business practices evolve.

25. What insurance considerations exist for Regulation FD social media violations?

Directors and officers insurance may provide coverage for Regulation FD violations, but policies vary significantly in their coverage of social media activities. Companies should review insurance provisions specifically related to securities law violations and consider additional coverage for digital communications risks.

Conclusion

SEC Regulation FD social media compliance represents a critical component of modern investor relations strategy, requiring public companies to balance effective digital communication with strict regulatory requirements. Successful compliance demands comprehensive policies, robust monitoring systems, and ongoing training that addresses the unique challenges of real-time social media engagement while maintaining fair disclosure principles.

When developing Regulation FD compliance frameworks, companies should prioritize prevention over remediation, invest in appropriate technology solutions, and establish clear accountability for social media oversight. The integration of compliance requirements with practical business operations enables companies to leverage social media effectively while avoiding potentially costly enforcement actions.

For public companies seeking to develop comprehensive Regulation FD social media compliance programs that integrate with broader investor relations strategies, explore WOLF Financial's specialized expertise in regulatory-compliant corporate communications and institutional finance marketing.

References

1. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Selective Disclosure and Insider Trading." Federal Register, October 23, 2000. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-7881.htm
2. Securities and Exchange Commission. "SEC Staff Guidance on Regulation FD Compliance." Division of Corporation Finance, 2001. https://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/regfd-interp.htm
3. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Materiality Guidance for Public Companies." SEC Fast Answers, 2023. https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersmaterialityhtm.html
4. Cornell Law School. "17 CFR 243.100 - General Rule Regarding Selective Disclosure." Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/243.100
5. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Form 8-K Current Report Requirements." SEC Forms, 2024. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8400.htm
6. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Cease-and-Desist Proceedings." SEC Enforcement, 2024. https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersceasehtm.html
7. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. "Technology and Social Media." FINRA Regulatory Notice 19-18, 2019. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/19-18
8. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Social Media and Investment-Related Communications." SEC Guidance, 2022. https://www.sec.gov/investment/im-guidance-2012-04.pdf
9. New York Stock Exchange. "Listed Company Manual Section 202.06." NYSE Corporate Governance, 2024. https://nyseguide.srorules.com/listed-company-manual
10. Securities and Exchange Commission. "Cybersecurity Risk Management for Investment Advisers." SEC Release, 2023. https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2023/ia-6204.pdf

Important Disclaimers

Disclaimer: Educational information only. Not financial, legal, medical, or tax advice.

Risk Warnings: All investments carry risk, including loss of principal. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Conflicts of Interest: This article may contain affiliate links; see our disclosures.

Publication Information: Published: 2025-01-27 · Last updated: 2025-01-27T00:00:00Z

About the Author

Author: Gav Blaxberg, Founder, WOLF Financial
LinkedIn Profile